Every presidential election (or primary) needs a clown prince... a court jester... a “fool”. The ones that don't are bland and boring – c'mon, admit it! There's nothing like a “colorful”, if hopeless, candidate to lend color and interest to what is, in our time, a predictably inane process. It sort of calls up what little remains of the American tendency toward crankiness and contrariness – to never quite “behave” in the way expected by our betters.
The one filling the role this time
around seems to be Donald Trump, unless another contender appears.
What is Trump's sin? Basically, saying what everyone else is
thinking but doesn't dare say. This is also known as a “gaffe”,
except in Trump's case it is anything but offhand and incidental.
While other Republican candidates are walking on eggs, afraid of
offending anybody for any reason, Trump is telling it like it is (or
like he believes it is), and this has made everyone in the Republican
establishment nervous. For, after all, don't we have a long history
of third party or quasi-third party candidates acting as “spoilers”?
Why, Trump could “blow it” for everyone else – for, that is,
the ever-expanding list of Republican candidates, ranging from those
who don't stand a chance to those who do stand a chance to be
nominated, but don't stand a chance of being elected. The Republican
field calls to mind the line in the Aretha Franklin song, “Chain
chain chain, chain of fools” -- but at least Trump has decided that
he has nothing to lose by saying what he really thinks on various
issues. And this is refreshing – just as any instance of wandering
off the Regime's reservation is refreshing. That brief, shining
moment of “telling it like it is”, to be followed – as always –
by the bland, gray, depressing reality of “the new boss, just like
the old boss”. Unlike the colorful and picturesque Trump, the gray
blandness of Jeb Bush seems ideally suited for the Republican
campaign next year – and ideally suited to lose. And, just as with
Romney, everyone will be wondering “What happened?” What
happened was that you nominated a gray face in a gray suit – poor
competition for the Democrats, who seem pretty good at coming up with
colorful, if profoundly corrupt, characters. (And maybe the color
and the corruption go together; this certainly seems to be what
Louisiana voters believed for many decades.)
I discussed “inevitability” in a
previous post, referring especially to Hillary Clinton. She is,
basically, poised to eat any and all Republican candidates for lunch,
no matter their support, funding, or how they appear in the polls.
The reasons are quite simple. She has demographics on her side. She
has close to fifty percent of the citizenry (and non-citizens) who
will vote Democratic no matter what, and she also has a party that is
highly skilled and experienced in stealing elections (despite their
disgraceful failures in 2000 and 2004). Plus, her constituency is
the very segment of the American population that is increasing in
number (despite her support for abortion on demand – a convenient
irony, if you will), whereas the Republican constituency is the
segment that is decreasing, and on the path to ultimate extinction.
So yes, the Republicans remain a factor in state and local elections,
but they are “history” when it comes to the presidency. And I'm
not saying that this is either a bad or a good thing – it's just
the way things are. After all, haven't the Republicans successfully
taken over the Democrat mantle as “the war party”? And aren't
they co-conspirators in virtually every attempt to increase the size
and scope of government? The only thing lacking among the
Republicans is “compassion” -- for aliens, minorities (both
racial and sexual), the disenfranchised, women, and all other
certified victim groups. They are, basically, standing in the way of
socialist Utopia, where all will be liberated, free, and not
threatened by expressions of “hate”, “triggers”, and
“micro-aggression”. Who could possibly object to that?
Yes, I know – some of you are still
worried about the Democrats/liberals/socialists gnawing away at the
fabric of society... making America something other than what is once
was... reducing us to second-class citizenship in the world... and so
on. All I have to say about that is that, from the very founding,
this country was sitting on a time bomb of its own making – a world
view characterized by materialism, secularism, and “humanism”.
The United States of America was intended to be a Masonic Utopia,
which it was, I suppose, for a season (at least until Andrew Jackson
appeared on the scene). But then strange, threatening things started
to happen. We had the influx of Irish Catholics fleeing the Famine
(which was, at least indirectly, an expression of British colonial
policy). Then we had liberated blacks after the Civil War. Then we
had the vast numbers of immigrants from Eastern and Southern Europe
in the late 1800s. And so on. How are you supposed to have, and
maintain, a WASP Utopia if you also have open borders (not to mention
industrialists who need cheap labor)? (If this sounds familiar,
that's because it is.) So the original intent of America was
compromised – not from the start, but soon after. We had to
tolerate all of this rabble... these Catholics... these
garlic-eaters... in order to, somehow, keep the American Experiment
on track. So America became diversified, and “multi-” pretty
much everything. But the old guard remained in charge, for
generations... and yet now even that dominance is starting to weaken.
(A corporate CEO these days is just as likely to have an Italian,
Arab, or Indian name as an old-line Yankee name. Most of the
Huntington Biffington IV's are now in the State Department, where
they can pursue their elitist and basically brain-dead (due to
inbreeding) lifestyle free from the unwashed who lack Ivy League diplomas and trust funds.)
Let's not get too excited about this,
though. White guys are still in charge – maybe not WASPs in the
strict sense, but certainly following in their footsteps. “Honorary
WASPs”, let's call them. And you might say -- “But, but –
don't we have a black president?” Yeah, right. Have you noticed
that, despite all of the populist rhetoric, he remains an abject
servant of Wall Street and the money power? And anyone who follows
him will suffer the same fate; they wouldn't be allowed to take
office if they weren't already completely co-opted. Sure, they're
allowed to talk populist talk, but when it comes to the bottom line,
they follow orders from the corporate and banking world, the
armaments makers, the EU, and Israel, which together constitute what
I call the Cabal. (If you are thinking, “Why didn't he include the
Evangelicals?” it's because they are hapless dupes, and not really
in charge of anything. Their alleged political power is illusory;
they serve as a cheering section and nothing more.)
This is simply the way things are, and
it's useless to fight it, or pretend things are any other way. After
all, there are worse things than living under the rule of the Cabal,
or Regime. (Anyone for the Khmer Rouge? How about the Red Guard?
The Cheka? Let's be thankful for small favors.)
Yes, it's true that our Masonic Utopia,
which seems to be slowly turning into green slime like some monster
in a horror film, is not the worst of all possible worlds.
Catholics, in particular, have to be satisfied with being
second-class citizens, but maybe it's better than being a first-class
citizen in Sicily, who knows? The point – for people who consider
themselves “persons of principle” rather than “pragmatists”
-- is not just standard of living or quality of life, but a real,
profound sense of freedom. Do we have it, or is it just an illusion?
Are we skating on thin ice all of the time, only pretending that
it's something solid? It's easy enough to find out the answer when
some government agency like the IRS or the EPA knocks on your door –
then you find out you don't have any more rights than some hapless
citizen in a totalitarian society.
But if freedom is an illusion, does
that mean that freedom at all times and in all places is an illusion?
Does it mean that we were never free? I think it means that if, on
any given day, you can do pretty much as you please as long as it
doesn't harm others, you are free in fact if not in principle. I
doubt if the citizens of any society, past or present, have ever been
free in principle – there are always restrictions, and not only
“reasonable” ones but ones designed to perpetuate the power
structure. One might say that if there is a power structure – that
is, if the society is anything but purely anarchistic – that is, if
it's a coherent “society” at all – that that power structure
will seek to perpetuate itself and increase its power. This is, it
seems, inevitable – and it may be one (or the main) reason why,
with a relatively ancient continuum of government, we find ourselves
where we are today. Historically, 239 years is not a long time –
but for a single system, government, or regime, it's a very long time
– time enough for anything with a half-life to have decayed into
nothingness. Any governmental system, no matter how well-intentioned
or originally benign, will tend to accrete power unto itself, and
what this implies is that there is a natural life expectancy to any
form of government, after which it ceases to be based on principles
and winds up based solely on politics and raw power. And it's not as
if we didn't have ample precursors to this in our history, starting
with the Civil War or before. It's just that, for whatever reason,
the decline has been slow (agonizingly so, according to the
radicals). It was about culture and moral habits, which served us
well in the past, but which are now being overcome, and again, there
is an air of inevitability about it all. Could this Utopia have gone
on forever? Perhaps it was just too contrary to human nature. In
any case, the emperor has now been exposed in all of his naked
splendor – starting with, I would say, Vietnam. If we are
sustaining ourselves more and more on illusion and less and less on
reality, then it's really just a matter of time before the entire
structure comes crashing down, and the time for illusions is over.
No comments:
Post a Comment